Skip to main content
Saturday, June 27, 2026
Charlotte, NC|
News

Charlotte Council Took Two Votes on I-77 Monday. The Resolution Passed. The Binding Vote Didn't.

Charlotte City Council passed a non-binding resolution on I-77 South Monday night and rejected the binding rescission that would have given it teeth. For uptown readers, the gap between what was said and what was voted matters.

Jack Beckett· Staff Writer
||3 min read
Fourth Ward Charlotte civic news
Fourth Ward Charlotte civic news

Correction (May 21, 2026): An earlier version of this takeaway said the council's motion to rescind its support for the I-77 South toll-lane partnership did not pass. It passed, 6 to 5. Six votes is a majority of the eleven-member council. Fourth Ward Charlotte regrets the error.

Before the Charlotte City Council voted on I-77 South Monday night, District 6 Council Member Kimberly Owens framed the project as something other than a highway expansion.

"No one on this dais made the decisions that originally prioritized growth and progress over people when these roads originally tore through black neighborhoods," Owens said. "But that doesn't absolve us of responsibility now."

The council took two votes on I-77 South Monday. The first was a non-binding resolution that calls for an independent third-party reevaluation of the corridor and asks NCDOT to pause the draft RFP for toll-lane development until those findings are in. It passed near-unanimously. Council Member Renée Johnson cast the only no vote.

Immediately after that result, Johnson moved to rescind the council's October 2024 approval of the I-77 public-private partnership at the regional level. That motion was the binding action, and it passed 6 to 5, a majority of the eleven-member council. Mayor Pro Tem James Mitchell Jr., who had publicly committed in April to supporting rescission, reversed and voted no, but the other six members carried it. The Black Political Caucus had asked the council for rescission for three months. The motion directs the city's representative on the Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning Organization to seek removal of the P3 approval.

For uptown readers, the takeaway is that the council did more than register an opinion. The resolution does not compel NCDOT to do anything, but the rescission carries weight, because it directs the city's representative on the Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning Organization to seek removal of the P3 approval. Council Members Ed Driggs and Malcolm Graham, who supported the resolution but opposed rescission, argued that pulling out of the P3 would forfeit $600 million in committed state funding, and the broader NCDOT relationship Charlotte needs on other state-road projects. The council took both steps: it put the position on the record, and it took the action.

The same night, the council unanimously scheduled a 150-day data center moratorium, the second time in two weeks this body has pushed back on growth assumptions it once accepted without question. The next I-77 conversation on the council's calendar is an interchange feasibility presentation Thursday. Council Member Victoria Watlington brings an independent evaluation from UNC Charlotte researchers to the transportation committee in early June, before the budget vote.

The full account is in The Charlotte Mercury, including Mitchell's reversal in full and the procedural mechanics at CRTPO. It is also the first major civic vote since Vi Lyles said she will resign June 30.

Update (May 21, 2026): On May 20, the Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning Organization voted by a two-thirds supermajority to rescind its support for the I-77 South toll-lane partnership, effectively ending the project in its current form.

Jack Beckett

Staff Writer

Staff writer for Mercury Local covering government, elections, public safety, and development across multiple publications. Beckett has filed more than 600 stories on local policy, crime, zoning, and civic accountability in Connecticut and the Carolinas.

More on Malcolm Graham

More in News